James Poulos:
The Republican Party is in danger of returning to its roots — back to the time when its two main constituencies did not belong to a single party. Before the Civil War brought them together, the nationalist, money-driven Whigs and the regional, moralist Abolitionists held little in common. Now, the debt debacle has carried Republicans back to the deep divide present at their party’s creation.
One faction declares that without prosperity, all is lost. The other insists only repentance can save us. Both Prosperity Republicans and Repentance Republicans believe they are in a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party.
The Reagan-era fusionism that once held them together has hit the ash heap of history — hastened to its grave by the political and economic reckoning that Reagan could defer but we can’t.
Now, Repentance Republicans view Prosperity Republicans as inescapably corrupted by an unsustainable form of crony capitalist governance. Prosperity Republicans view Repentance Republicans as unmanageably captivated with an unstable form of politically principled purity.
With neither faction able to triumph or surrender, both must change. The only fusionism that can succeed today must defeat the claims to dominance of both big GOP factions.
Fortunately for Republicans, the new path to unity isn’t as harrowing as the fight for the Union. Some fear that libertarianism is too theoretically brittle and politically uncompromising to form the foundation of a new Republican consensus. But whatever your judgment of libertarianism in its ideologically pure form, the triumph of practical libertarianism over the Republican Party is as necessary as it is inevitable.
The two factions each already claim a variety of libertarianism.
Read the rest. It's good. Many conservative Christians in our rural county campaigned and voted for Ron Paul in the last primaries. I also met several conservative Christians through my old blog (most did not realize at first that the "born again" part of the title was satirical) who were also Paulites.
One such family in Texas comes to mind. They are real holy-rollers (like our nearest neighbors who attend a church were they "talk in tongues" and run around trying to catch the Holy Ghost in a brown paper bag - well, I'm just kidding about the bag). The Texas mom home-schooled her kids and her two oldest daughters had blogs. They joined the Compatriots blogroll that I started.
One day I wrote a post about why I disagree with "gay rights" (and all group identity "rights" for that matter) in which I addressed some controversial subjects. The Texas mom emailed me to "check" me out and make sure that her kids were not hanging out with a dirty old man.
After that, I toned down the more controversial aspects the blog and ended up with dozens of Christian "followers". I ended up being their affirmative action "token fag". Most were old-fashioned bible-thumping "social conservatives". But a surprising number were libertarian when it came to social issues. They still believed that homosexuality is evil but they did not think that they could (or should) use government to outlaw it.
Western conservatives (including the Christians) seem to be just naturally "live and let live" libertarians but many of my Christian "blog buddies" were from the South and even some of them were libertarian which is unusual because most "conservative" Southerners seem to be converted Dixiecrats who love big government.
The saner and more libertarian Christians realized that using government to push one's agenda is a two-edged sword: when the other side is in power they will obviously use government coercion to push their atheist dialectical materialism aka Marxism and destroy Christianity. I'll take a Christian over a communist any day.